“Stupid Is As Stupid Does”: The Intellectual Laziness Behind Anti–Identity Politics Rhetoric

8 mins read

Every now and then, pop culture gives us a phrase so deceptively simple, so wrapped in rural charm, that we fail to see the philosophical sledgehammer behind it.

“Stupid is as stupid does.”

You’ve heard it. Maybe you chuckled. Maybe you dismissed it as Southern gibberish with Hollywood flair. But let me offer you a reframe: that line is a scalpel. A surgical strike. A full-on indictment of behavior over branding, outcomes over optics.

And when applied to the loudest critics of “identity politics,” it becomes something even sharper: a mirror.

Because the truth is, anyone who still says identity politics is a bad thing is either not paying attention or willfully protecting a rigged system. And if that offends you, go read the idiom again… slowly this time.

Identity Politics Is Not the Problem, It’s the Premise

Let’s cut the performance and get to the core: America was built on identity politics.

Don’t believe me? Let’s try a little multiple choice.

Who got to vote first in this country?
A) Anyone with ideas
B) Only white, landowning men
C) Indigenous women with 5,000 years of political governance

If you said B, congratulations, you’ve just identified the original identity politics. It’s called white male property-based democracy, and it’s been shaping our systems since day one.

We are a nation where:

  • You need an ID to vote but not to buy an AR-15.
  • Your zip code predicts your life expectancy.
  • Your name on a résumé can decide whether you get a callback.
  • And your skin color determines whether you’re seen as a “voter” or a “thug.”

Yet somehow, acknowledging identity in policy debates is now called “divisive”?

No, friend. What’s divisive is pretending identity doesn’t matter while weaponizing it at every turn.

You Can’t Build a House on Identity and Then Call It a Flood

The hypocrisy is Olympic-level.

The same politicians who scream about “identity politics”:

  • Write voter ID laws so specific they practically demand your genealogy,
  • Launch crusades against affirmative action while collecting generational wealth from exclusive universities,
  • And gut DEI programs while clinging to legacy admissions and corporate boards that still look like 1963.

This isn’t a war against identity politics. This is a war against identity politics that centers someone other than white men.

Because here’s what they won’t say out loud: they don’t hate identity politics they just hate yours.

“Stupid Is As Stupid Does”: The Idiom They Should’ve Studied

Forrest Gump’s famous line wasn’t meant to be cute. It was meant to be true. “Stupid is as stupid does” means stupidity isn’t about how someone looks, sounds, or identifies. It’s about what they do.

So let’s talk behavior.

If you:

  • Condemn identity politics while benefiting from systems built on race, class, and gender privilege,
  • Reject programs aimed at correcting historical inequity while hoarding unearned advantage,
  • Cry “division” when Black, Brown, LGBTQ+, or disabled communities demand inclusion—

Then you’re not being smart. You’re being performative.

And if your entire political stance boils down to: “Stop talking about race and gender so I can keep pretending history started in 2020,” well, stupid is as stupid does.

Let’s Call It What It Really Is: Strategic Amnesia

The outrage over identity politics isn’t intellectual. It’s strategic amnesia, a way to forget the foundational truth of this country: identity has always shaped policy.

Not just recently. Not just under Democrats. Not just on the “woke” Left.

  • Identity built the three-fifths compromise.
  • Identity shaped who could own land, testify in court, or marry whom.
  • Identity dictated internment camps, Jim Crow laws, redlining, and who could access the GI Bill.

And today? It still decides who gets shot in traffic stops, whose communities get poisoned water, and who’s told their existence is “too political.”

So when you say “I don’t like identity politics,” what you’re really saying is: “I liked it better when my identity was the default and everyone else’s was optional.”

Final Word: This Isn’t About Division — It’s About Denial

If “stupid is as stupid does,” then the real stupidity isn’t in misunderstanding identity politics it’s in deliberately pretending not to.

It’s the kind of stupidity that wears a suit and calls itself “smart.”
The kind that closes schools and says, “Some kids just don’t belong.”
The kind that erases Black history and pretends it never happened.
The kind that sees injustice, then blames the people who speak up about it.

Let’s be clear:
The rejection of identity politics is not an intellectual position. It’s a survival tactic for supremacy.
It’s not a difference in philosophy. It’s a defense of the default.

If you see nothing wrong with showing ID to board a plane,
If you’re fine flashing ID to vote,
To access your job,
To cash a check,
To open a bank account,
To pick up a prescription,
To enter a federal building.

Then you already live in an identity-based society.

So let’s be honest:
If you accept identity when it’s used to control access, but reject it when it’s used to demand fairness,
that’s not just hypocrisy, that’s stupidity, weaponized.

Every day in America, we’re asked to prove who we are. We use ID to protect our money, access our jobs, board planes, pick up prescriptions, and keep our communities secure. Identity is how we prove we belong. It’s how we prove we are, who we say we are.

So if identity is acceptable to keep banks safe, borders safe, buildings safe, and ballots secure.
Then why does it suddenly become a problem when identity is used to make policy more fair?

The truth is simple: identity has always mattered in this country. You just didn’t mind until it wasn’t only protecting you.

Michael Bailey is the Division Managing Editor of INFO24 Media Group’s Eye Series Digital Publishing Division, bringing decades of experience in photojournalism, political writing, and community-centered storytelling. Known for translating complex political issues into clear, accessible narratives, Michael has built a distinctive career at the intersection of media, business, and politics. His work as both a new media correspondent and photojournalist captures the cultural, social, and political realities of minority communities across South Carolina and beyond. A respected voice and sought-after commentator, he continues to provide sharp insight and meaningful context on the challenges and triumphs shaping communities of color.

Previous Story

WOW Studio One Unveils Sultry New Stage Play “Love Lies” at Harbison Theatre

Next Story

Columbia Metropolitan Airport Introduces Experience CAE Guest Pass Program for Non-Traveling Guests

Latest from National Politics